Survey for Canadian Alliance Leadership Candidates, 2002
Stockwell Day
Abortion
Abortion is the
deliberate killing of a child in the womb of the mother. (Note: surgical
or medical interventions, designed to prevent the death of the mother,
i.e., in cases of tubal pregnancy or cervical cancer, which result
in the unintended and undesired death of the preborn child, are not
abortions.)
1. In terms of
your personal views, do you consider yourself
a) pro-life
b) pro-choice
c) pro-abortion
d) pro-life with exceptions (for life of mother, rape and incest)
2. When does human life begin?
a) conception
(fertilization)
b) implantation
3. Would you initiate any public discussion on the issue of
abortion or initiate any legislative measures to end abortion?
As a provincial
cabinet minister, my support for de-insuring medically unnecessary
procedures initiated much public discussion about the issue. Obviously,
as Leader of the Opposition, my pro-life position already has initiated
considerable public discussion on the issue.
Because the
Canadian Alliance grassroots members decided not to have a policy
on the issue of abortion, I could not as Leader initiate party sponsored
legislation on the issue. However, Canadian Alliance democratic reforms
would allow Members of Parliament and private citizens to bring forward
for debate legislative measures designed to protect human life through
free votes and citizen initiated referenda.
4. Would you stand in the way of any initiative - from one of your
own MPs or from elsewhere - to ban or restrict abortion?
No.
5. If you were
given the opportunity to vote on legislation to ban abortion that
came before Parliament by way of the democratic process, would you
vote in favour of it or against it?
In favour.
6. Abortion is
an elective procedure that has become a matter of social choice. Would
you support measures to end taxpayer funding of abortion and to classify
abortion as non-medically necessary in the Canada Health Act?
I supported
measures in Alberta aimed at defunding abortion. As a medically unnecessary
procedure, I oppose current federal attempts to require provinces
to provide and fund abortion services, and as Prime Minister would
respect provincial jurisdiction over determining what constitutes
a medically necessary service.
I support full
disclosure of all health aspects of abortion and information and support
for pregnancy care and adoption services.
7. Would you support measures to protect the freedom of conscience
of health care workers who are pressured to take part in abortion
and other medical procedures in violation of their consciences?
Yes. I have
already done so in the Alberta Legislature.
8. Is abortion primarily a criminal issue (federal jurisdiction) or
a health issue on which you would defer to the provincial legislatures?
(This is a crucial question because Members of Parliament claim it
must be dealt with provincially while provincial politicians call
it a federal matter.)
Funding and
regulation of abortion procedures fall under the purview of provincial
responsibility for health care. Any legal limits on abortion per se
would be a federal matter.
Euthanasia
9. Do you believe
the current law pertaining to euthanasia and assisted suicide is satisfactory?
Yes. I agreed
with the Supreme Court decision which said that young Tracy Latimer's
life was as valuable as any other Canadian's.
9. A) If not,
how would you change the law?
10. Would you work to strengthen legal protection for the elderly
and disabled and other vulnerable people through improved access to
palliative care? (The federal government can participate in these
efforts through the funding of research and education and by setting
up national standards.)
Yes. I support
the implementation of many of the measures recommended in the Senate
Report on "Quality End-of-Life Care: The Right of Every Canadian",
while ensuring that a clear distinction is maintained between passive
euthanasia and genuine palliative care, and ensuring that provincial
jurisdiction over health care is respected."
Reproductive and Genetic Technologies
11. Do you support
the Canadian Alliance Minority Report of the Standing Committee on
Health on Assisted Reproduction?
Yes. I am concerned
about the Health Committee
report on reproductive technologies which would allow embryonic stem
cell research - allowing human embryos, which are human life, to be
destroyed in the name of science.
12. Would you support a permanent extension of the three-year ban
on embryo research proposed in the Minority Report? At the same time,
would you undertake vigorous promotion of adult stem cell research
as a viable and practical alternative?
Yes.
13. Do you believe
the government should permit any experimentation on embryos, even
prior to 14 days gestation, as the draft government legislation currently
proposes?
No.
Governance
14. When a politician's
conscience (and therefore presumably the position he verbalizes when
running for leadership) and his constituents' wishes collide on an
issue about which the elected official holds strong views (for example:
child pornography), do you believe that the politician should stand
behind his conscience or vote according to his constituents' wishes?
Explain:
I believe
that it is the duty of a democratically elected representative to
be clear about his conscientious beliefs, and to represent his constituents
to the best of his ability by voting in accordance with his constituents'
wishes. However, I believe that this obligation cannot bind legislators
to vote in favour of measures which would abrogate inalienable human
rights, such as the rights to life, liberty, and property.
15. A) If your response places higher priority on conscience over
constituent wishes, please tell us whether abortion is one of those
issues about which you hold sufficiently strong views to make this
question applicable?
Yes. I believe
that abortion violates the inalienable right to life possessed by
all human beings, and have publicly made this known to my constituents
so that they are aware of this when they vote. I also support citizens
rights to a democratic recall of their MP if they feel they are not
being properly served.
B) What about euthanasia?
Yes. I believe
that deliberate killing of the elderly or the infirm violates the
inalienable right to life possessed by all human beings.
Thank You
Stockwell Day
|