Voting Records

Candidate, Ken Dryden

Liberal Party, York Centre, ON

Bio

Ken Dryden
Not Supportable
Not Supportable
CLC rating: Pro-abortion, anti-traditional marriage
First elected (yyyy.mm.dd): 2004.06.28
Previous Occupation: Executive manager, hockey player
Birthdate (yyyy.mm.dd): 1947.08.08
Percentage in last election: 43.5%
Victory margin last election: 5.5%
Religion / Faith: not known

Contact

Ken Dryden
Parliamentary Office
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A6
Tel: 613-941-6339
Fax: 613-941-2421
Constituency Offices
3A-1030 Sheppard Ave W
Toronto, Ontario
M3H 2T6
Tel: 416-546-4536
Fax: 416-638-1407
Ken Dryden

Here is Ken Dryden's voting record relating to life and family issues:

Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision Vote Score
Bob Rae's pro-abortion Motion
A Liberal Motion to expand abortion & contraception throughout Africa, at Canadian taxpayer expense. This was an attempt to co-opt a good Maternal & Child Health initiative of the Conservative government whose purpose was saving the lives of pregnant women and children by providing clean water, medicine and health-care workers assist with child birth. Bob Rae's abortion Motion was narrowly defeated 138 to 144. [Mar. 23, 2010]
Yes bad
M-221, child protection motion
To raise the age of consent for sex from 14 to 16 [Sep 28, 2005]
No bad
Motion 12, Re-open debate on definition of marriage
[Dec 2006]
No bad
C-38, A bill to abolish the true definition of marriage
[June 28, 2005]
Yes bad
C-484, Unborn victims of Crime Act
Common sense legislation that would allow criminal charges to be laid in the death or injury of an unborn child when the childs mother is the victim of violent crime. This cannot be considered a "pro-life" bill because it specifically excludes deliberate acts of abortion by the woman. Nonetheless, it is a good "pro-family" bill because it protects women and their wanted children from violent crime. (Mar5/08)
No bad
C-313, Age of Consent child protection bill
Raised the age of consent for sex from 14 to 16 [Sep 28, 2005]
No bad
Bill C389, 3rd reading of the "Transsexual Bathroom Bill"
This radical bill sought to add "gender identity" and "gender expression" to the Human Rights Act and Criminal Code. If passed, the bill would've endangered women and children by creating a legal right for men who "identify" as the opposite sex, to use female public washrooms. Male sexual predators or peeping toms would have certainly used this as an opening to enter the girl's washroom. It is unconscionable for legislators to put women and children in such a compromising position. It would also create a legal nightmare for businesses that would be required to allow staff to cross-dress in the work place. Furthermore, this would harm youth by cooperating with mental illness and encouraging sexually-confused young men to perceive themselves as women, and vice versa. It will also open the door for radical activists to insist that transsexualism must be inserted in school curriculum and taught in classrooms as something that is normal, natural and healthy. This bill passed final reading in House of Commons by a 143-135 vote on February 9, 2011, but then, thankfully, died in the Senate when a federal election was called.
Yes bad
Bill C-384, Legalize euthanasia & assisted suicide
A horrible bill that would have given doctors permission to kill people who are seriously ill but not dying and who in fact, have a treatable condition. Doctors would also have been permitted to kill people suffering with treatable chronic depression. This bill was defeated on second reading, 59 votes in favour to 228 votes Against.
[Apr 21, 2010]
Yes bad
Bill C-510, to protect pregnant women from coercion to abort
This private member's bill by Conservative MP Rod Bruinooge, also called Roxanne's Law, was a common sense bill to protect women and their unborn children from coercion to abort. Abortion coercion by boyfriends, husbands, relatives and even physicians is very common in Canada. Unfortunately, the bill was defeated in 2nd reading by a vote of 97 to 178. [December 15, 2010]
No bad
Not Supportable
Life & family issues voting score: 0%
Ken Dryden

Here are quotes from Ken Dryden on various life and family issues:

On legislation (C-38) set to abolish the true definition of marriage & the family:  "Most of the wisdom of the Bible has held up in different times and places and for different people. But to me, no wisdom is timeless... To me, man and woman, man and man, or woman and woman, marriage is for two people who love each other, who want to be with each other..." [The Toronto Star, Jun 24, 2005]

Revealing a prejudice against stay-at-home parents during an interview on Ottawa's CFRA talk radio, Dryden dismissed helping stay-at-home parents going so far as to compare them to:  "parents who try to treat their children at home rather than take them to a doctor or to the hospital." [LifeSiteNews.com, Nov 24, 2005]

Ken Dryden

Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Ken Dryden on 2008.

Question Response
If elected, will you strive to introduce and pass laws to protect unborn children from the time of conception (fertilization) onward? no response
If elected, would you support all legislative or policy proposals that would result in a meaningful increase of respect and protection for unborn human life? no response
Are there any circumstances under which you believe a woman should have access to abortion? (note: Medical treatments to save the life of a mother and which result in the UNINTENDED death of her unborn child, are NOT abortions. Eg. in case of tubal pregnancy or cervical cancer) no response
If elected, will you oppose any legislative or regulatory measures designed to permit the deliberate euthanasia of a human being or designed to permit "doctor-assisted suicide"? no response
Ken Dryden

There are no videos available for Ken Dryden.

  • Legend for Light Rating System
  • Green Light
    GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE
  • Red Light
    RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE
  • Amber Light
    AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.