Chris Alexander - record

 

Below are the key criteria considered by CLC in rating Chris Alexander with an "F" score for the Conservative Party Leadership race.  

 

CRITERIA ASSESSMENT Score

Stance on abortion

Alexander never completed CLC's election questionnaire. During his short career in parliament he had only one opportunity to vote on pro-life bills, and voted badly. He voted against Stephen Woodworth's Motion 312 which sought to study when a child in the womb becomes a human being.

 

Stance on euthanasia

Unknown

 

--

Willing to re-open abortion debate?

No

(Note: In the absence of a campaign pledge saying he would reopen the abortion debate, one must assume the candidate has no intention of doing so).

Willing to enact government legislation to protect unborn children?

No

(Note: In the absence of a campaign pledge to bring forward pro-life government legislation, and in light of his past voting record, one must assume the candidate has no intention of doing so)

How he voted on radical bill to invent fake new rights to "gender identity" and "gender expression"

In favour

(Alexander voted for the NDP's "bathroom bill" C-279, on second and third reading.  The bill aimed to grant biological males the legal right to access girls bathrooms, changerooms and showers. It also presented a grave threat to free speech.)

Has he pledged to repeal gender identity bill if becomes Prime Minister?

No

(Note: In the absence of a campaign pledge to repeal the Liberal government's legislation and in light of his support for gender identity theory, one must assume the candidate has no intention of repealing.)

Marched in Gay Pride Parade?

Yes

(According to a CTV interview during the campaign trail)

Other notable factors

Alexander has avoided social conservative issues during the campaign trail.

In 2013, he was one of only 17 Conservative-majority MPs who broke ranks with Prime Minister Stephen Harper's principled stand against the NDP's transsexual "Bathroom Bill", by voting in favour of Bill C-279. Alexander helped it to pass third reading, thus granting this harmful, anti-scientific ideology greater respect and credibility amongst other MPs and Senators. Today, a Liberal government version of the same bill is on the verge of becoming federal law.

 

--


 

<<Back to Main