Councillor Lisa McKay
Eastern Charlotte, NB
Electoral District: Councillor at Large
Bio
CLC rating: Pro-life, pro-free speech
Rating Comments: Lisa gave perfect answers to CLC's 2022 election survey.
First elected (yyyy.mm.dd): 2022.11.28
Percentage in last election: 18.91% (2022)
Victory margin last election: 0.37% (2022)
Religion / Faith: Unknown
Contact
Parliamentary Office
New Brunswick
Here is Lisa McKay's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Lisa McKay. | ||
There are no quotes for Lisa McKay at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Lisa McKay on Nov. 23, 2022.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Organizations like Planned Parenthood (PP) routinely counsel women to have abortions, and increasingly, are involved in dispensing the chemical abortion pill. Given that abortion is a controversial practice that many taxpayers in your municipality find abhorrent, do you agree that PP and similar “sexual health agencies" should not receive taxpayer funds through the municipality? | Yes |
| There has been a move in some municipal jurisdictions to pass bylaws which establish censorship zones, also called “bubble zones”, around abortion facilities. These unconstitutional censorship zones make it illegal to express peaceful pro-life speech, including silent prayer, on taxpayer-owned public sidewalks within the vicinity of abortion facilities and pharmacies which dispense abortion pills. If elected, would you vote to oppose such a censorship bylaw? | Yes |
| Do you acknowledge that human life begins at conception (fertilization)? | Yes |
| Do you consider yourself pro-life or pro-choice? | Yes |
There are no videos available for Lisa McKay.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.