Candidate, Ken Ropcean
Edmonton, AB
Electoral District: Sipiwiyiniwak
Bio
If you own a copyright-free photo of this person, please send it to us
CLC rating: Unknown
Rating Comments: No contact info available to send our 2025 election survey, so this candidate's views on life issues is unknown.
Contact
Parliamentary Office
Alberta
Constituency Offices
Edmonton, Alberta
T5J 2R7
Here is Ken Ropcean's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Ken Ropcean. | ||
There are no quotes for Ken Ropcean at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Ken Ropcean on Sept. 19, 2025.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Organizations like Planned Parenthood (PP) routinely counsel women to have abortions, and increasingly, are involved in dispensing the chemical abortion pill. Given that abortion is a controversial practice that many taxpayers in your municipality find abhorrent, do you agree that PP and similar “sexual health agencies" should not receive taxpayer funds through the municipality? | survey not sent |
| There has been a move in some municipal jurisdictions to pass bylaws which establish censorship zones, also called “bubble zones”, around abortion facilities. These unconstitutional censorship zones make it illegal to express peaceful pro-life speech, including silent prayer, on taxpayer-owned public sidewalks within the vicinity of abortion facilities and pharmacies which dispense abortion pills. If elected, would you vote to oppose such a censorship bylaw, if it were ever proposed? | survey not sent |
| Do you acknowledge that human life begins at conception (fertilization)? | survey not sent |
| Do you consider yourself pro-life or pro-choice? | survey not sent |
There are no videos available for Ken Ropcean.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.