Candidate, Jackie Sargent
St. Albert, AB
Electoral District: Elected At Large
Bio
If you own a copyright-free photo of this person, please send it to us
CLC rating: Caution
Rating Comments: Jackie refused to answer the 2025 questionnaire, claiming "I am choosing to focus my campaign on municipal priorities, services, and policies that directly affect all residents of our city. As such, I will not be completing your survey."
Contact
Parliamentary Office
Constituency Offices
St. Albert, Alberta
Here is Jackie Sargent's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Jackie Sargent. | ||
There are no quotes for Jackie Sargent at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Jackie Sargent on Sept. 25, 2025.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Organizations like Planned Parenthood (PP) routinely counsel women to have abortions, and increasingly, are involved in dispensing the chemical abortion pill. Given that abortion is a controversial practice that many taxpayers in your municipality find abhorrent, do you agree that PP and similar “sexual health agencies" should not receive taxpayer funds through the municipality? | Refused to reply |
| There has been a move in some municipal jurisdictions to pass bylaws which establish censorship zones, also called “bubble zones”, around abortion facilities. These unconstitutional censorship zones make it illegal to express peaceful pro-life speech, including silent prayer, on taxpayer-owned public sidewalks within the vicinity of abortion facilities and pharmacies which dispense abortion pills. If elected, would you vote to oppose such a censorship bylaw, if it were ever proposed? | Refused to reply |
| Do you acknowledge that human life begins at conception (fertilization)? | Refused to reply |
| Do you consider yourself pro-life or pro-choice? | Refused to reply |
There are no videos available for Jackie Sargent.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.