Candidate, Tom Muench
Richmond Hill, ON
Electoral District: Ward 02
Bio
CLC rating: Pro-life, pro-free speech
Rating Comments: Gave perfect answers to CLC's 2026 city council candidate survey. Tom is known to be pro-life and pro-family. He also ran for city council in 2022.
Percentage in last election: 31.0% (2022)
Victory margin last election: -8.4% (2022)
Religion / Faith: unknown
Contact
Parliamentary Office
Constituency Offices
, Ontario
M3H1A7
Here is Tom Muench's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Tom Muench. | ||
There are no quotes for Tom Muench at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Tom Muench on Sep. 9, 2026.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Organizations like Planned Parenthood (PP) routinely counsel women to have abortions, and increasingly, are involved in dispensing the chemical abortion pill. Given that abortion is a controversial practice that many taxpayers in your municipality find abhorrent, do you agree that PP and similar “sexual health agencies" should not receive taxpayer funds through the municipality? | Yes |
| Do you acknowledge that human life begins at conception (fertilization)? | Yes |
| Do you consider yourself pro-life or pro-choice? | pro-life |
| There has been a move in some municipal jurisdictions to pass bylaws which establish censorship zones, also called “bubble zones”, around abortion facilities. These unconstitutional censorship zones make it illegal to express peaceful pro-life speech, including silent prayer, on taxpayer-owned public sidewalks within the vicinity of abortion facilities and pharmacies which dispense abortion pills. If elected, would you vote to oppose such a censorship bylaw? | Yes |
There are no videos available for Tom Muench.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.