Candidate, Lee Sheward
Prairie Rose School Division No. 8, AB
Electoral District: Ward 3 – Redcliff / Dunmore Ward
Bio
If you own a copyright-free photo of this person, please send it to us
CLC rating: Pro-transgender ideology
Rating Comments: Note: CLC's rating for this candidate was guided by answers to a 2025 questionnaire that the candidate filled out for an Alberta-based parental rights group called Parents for Choice in Education. In the PCE survey, Lee indicates that she believes so-called "gender identity" is a human right of children, and that it supersedes the rights of parents to protect their children from transgender propaganda, which advocates the sexual mutilation of minors using puberty-inhibiting drugs, transsexual hormones, and surgical amputations and disfigurations.
Percentage in last election: 25.0% (2025)
Victory margin last election: -4.3% (2025)
Religion / Faith: Unknown
Contact
Parliamentary Office
Alberta
Constituency Offices
, Alberta
Here is Lee Sheward's voting record relating to life and family issues:
| Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision | Vote | Score |
|---|---|---|
| There are no votes, surveys or policy decisions to display for Lee Sheward. | ||
There are no quotes for Lee Sheward at this time.
Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Lee Sheward on 2025.
| Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Do you agree that parents, not the state, have the inherent right of primacy in education of children? | survey not yet sent |
| Will you defend the inherent right of parents to be notified in advance regarding any lesson, speaker or presentation involving controversial issues such as abortion, contraception, homosexuality, and gender ideology? | survey not yet sent |
| Do you agree that parents should have the right to withdraw their children from classroom lessons or presentations involving controversial issues such as abortion, contraception, homosexuality, and gender ideology? | survey not yet sent |
There are no videos available for Lee Sheward.
-
GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE -
RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE -
AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.