Action Centre

Don't Take Away Freedom of Expression and Peaceful Assembly

Background on the Issue
On May 29, 2017, MPP Yasir Naqvi, the previous Attorney General of Ontario, announced that he would table a bill in the fall to transform public sidewalks into “No Free Speech Zones” outside every abortion facility in the province. The bill was passed in October later that year, and has been put into force since February 1, 2018.

These bubble zones within which pro-life speech and expression are banned, prevent pro-lifers from demonstrating or counselling within a certain radius of an abortion facility where children are killed by abortion. That includes hospitals and clinics where abortions are committed, and pharmacies are now able to apply as well. These bubble zones are expected to resemble British Columbia's and Newfoundland and Labrador’s, which have bubble zone laws “not exceeding 50 metres” around abortion facilities.

Use the automated tool below to quickly send your local MPP a pre-written message. You can also add to the pre-written message with your own, personalized note. To view and select an alternate pre-written message, refresh your browser screen. After sending your email, a blind copy will also be sent to your inbox, for your own records.
Show More Background
Step 1: Compose your message
Local MPP
Not a reasonable limit
Dear M.P.P. [Recipient's name will be automatically inserted]:

An authoritarian piece of legislation has been passed by the previous Attorney General, which makes taxpayer-owned public property into ‘no go zones’ for freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly. Since Canada is a democracy, we cannot tolerate such authoritarianism.

The law in question created a bubble zone around every abortion facility in Ontario, and within that radius, pro-life signs, sidewalk counsellors, and demonstrators will be banned, including on the publicly-owned sidewalks.

Moving pro-lifers away from the target of their protest— in this case the facility where children are killed by abortion - be it by 20, 30, or 50 metres— is not a “minor” infringement on civil rights. Such censorship dilutes the message of the protesters in such a way that their freedom of expression is infringed upon in dramatic fashion.

You ought to consider as well that if “safety” is the alleged reason for government intervention. What is being done to protect the safety of preborn children – half of which are girls - scheduled for termination at these facilities?
* - Required Fields