Action Centre

Don't Take Away Freedom of Expression and Peaceful Assembly

Background on the Issue
On May 29, 2017, MPP Yasir Naqvi, the previous Attorney General of Ontario, announced that he would table a bill in the fall to transform public sidewalks into “No Free Speech Zones” outside every abortion facility in the province. The bill was passed in October later that year, and has been put into force since February 1, 2018.

These bubble zones within which pro-life speech and expression are banned, prevent pro-lifers from demonstrating or counselling within a certain radius of an abortion facility where children are killed by abortion. That includes hospitals and clinics where abortions are committed, and pharmacies are now able to apply as well. These bubble zones are expected to resemble British Columbia's and Newfoundland and Labrador’s, which have bubble zone laws “not exceeding 50 metres” around abortion facilities.

Use the automated tool below to quickly send your local MPP a pre-written message. You can also add to the pre-written message with your own, personalized note. To view and select an alternate pre-written message, refresh your browser screen. After sending your email, a blind copy will also be sent to your inbox, for your own records.
Show More Background
Step 1: Compose your message
Local MPP
The Right to Protest Must Be Protected
Dear Member of Provincial Parliament, [Recipient's name will be automatically inserted]:

It has come to my attention that the Ontario government has passed a bubble zone law around all abortion facilities.

Those pushing for a bubble zone law, including the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada, have called pro-life protests “intimidating for patients and staff.” This is a rather subjective statement that can be open to a lot of different meanings, but nonetheless it is a slander on pro-lifers. Ontarians who demonstrate at abortion facilities are often witnessing by quietly praying, or gently offering literature.

However, for the sake of argument, let’s say that someone did find the protest “intimidating”, in the sense of wishing they didn’t have to look at signs that make them feel guilty. Or even if protesters were actually vocal and assertive, that’s typical of any protest—be it at an oil and gas corporation’s office, at City Hall, or at an MPP’s constituency office.

Protesters are often trying to appeal to the consciences of others. They’re trying to catch someone’s eye. They have conviction, and regardless of what they’re protesting, the protest itself is valuable. It strengthens our democracy. It makes us think critically about our beliefs. It makes us act on the principles we stand for, even if we are resented for it.

The intention of pro-life protesters is to dissuade women from killing their preborn baby and to offer them alternatives to abortion, not to intimidate anyone. However, if subjective feelings of “intimidation” are a by-product of a protest they must be tolerated nonetheless. To compromise the ability of Canadians to protest is too great a cost, so that some people can avoid feeling that something they’re doing might be wrong.

I am your constituent in the riding of [Recipient's riding name will be automatically inserted], and I ask you to lobby your colleagues in government to overturn the bubble zone bill. [Recipient's first name will be automatically inserted], please oppose the bill and educate your fellow M.P.P.s on why they should revoke it too.
* - Required Fields