Voting Records

Candidate, Lee Richardson

Conservative Party, Calgary Rocky Ridge, AB


Lee Richardson
CLC rating: evaluation pending
Rating Comments: Questionnaire for 2015 not yet sent. Richardson announced his resignation from the House of Commons on May 30, 2012, in order to accept a job working for Alberta Premier Alison Redford. The Conservative nominee who will replace him in the upcoming by-election is the pro-abortion, anti-traditional marriage former journalist, Joan Crockatt.
First elected ( 1988.11.21
Previous Occupation: Businessman
Birthdate ( 1947.10.31
Percentage in last election: 55.6%
Victory margin last election: 37.7%
Religion / Faith: United Church


Lee Richardson
Parliamentary Office
House of Commons
432-C Centre Block
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A6
Tel: 613-995-1561
Fax: 613-995-1862
Constituency Offices
105-1410 11th Ave SW
Calgary, Alberta
T3C 0M8
Tel: 403-209-8683
Fax: 403-245-3468
Lee Richardson

Here is Lee Richardson's voting record relating to life and family issues:

Votes, Surveys and Policy Decision Vote Score
M-221, child protection motion
To raise the age of consent for sex from 14 to 16 [Sep 28, 2005]
Yes ok
Motion 12, Re-open debate on definition of marriage
[Dec 2006]
No bad
C-38, A bill to abolish the true definition of marriage
[June 28, 2005]
No ok
C-484, Unborn victims of Crime Act
Common sense legislation that would allow criminal charges to be laid in the death or injury of an unborn child when the childs mother is the victim of violent crime. This cannot be considered a "pro-life" bill because it specifically excludes deliberate acts of abortion by the woman. Nonetheless, it is a good "pro-family" bill because it protects women and their wanted children from violent crime. (Mar5/08)
Yes ok
C-313, Age of Consent child protection bill
Raised the age of consent for sex from 14 to 16 [Sep 28, 2005]
Yes ok
Bill C389, 3rd reading of the "Transsexual Bathroom Bill"
This radical bill sought to add "gender identity" and "gender expression" to the Human Rights Act and Criminal Code. If passed, the bill would've endangered women and children by creating a legal right for men who "identify" as the opposite sex, to use female public washrooms. Male sexual predators or peeping toms would have certainly used this as an opening to enter the girl's washroom. It is unconscionable for legislators to put women and children in such a compromising position. It would also create a legal nightmare for businesses that would be required to allow staff to cross-dress in the work place. Furthermore, this would harm youth by cooperating with mental illness and encouraging sexually-confused young men to perceive themselves as women, and vice versa. It will also open the door for radical activists to insist that transsexualism must be inserted in school curriculum and taught in classrooms as something that is normal, natural and healthy. This bill passed final reading in House of Commons by a 143-135 vote on February 9, 2011, but then, thankfully, died in the Senate when a federal election was called.
No ok
Survey on awarding Order of Canada to Henry Morgentaler
Do you agree with awarding the Order of Canada to abortionist Henry Morgentaler? (July 2008)
No ok
Motion 83, Inquiry into the medical necessity of abortion
Asked parliament to examine whether abortion is medically necessary and to report on its potential health risks to women (Oct 1, 2003)
Absent --
Bill C-384, Legalize euthanasia & assisted suicide
A horrible bill that would have given doctors permission to kill people who are seriously ill but not dying and who in fact, have a treatable condition. Doctors would also have been permitted to kill people suffering with treatable chronic depression. This bill was defeated on second reading, 59 votes in favour to 228 votes Against.
[Apr 21, 2010]
No ok
Bill C-510, to protect pregnant women from coercion to abort
This private member's bill by Conservative MP Rod Bruinooge, also called Roxanne's Law, was a common sense bill to protect women and their unborn children from coercion to abort. Abortion coercion by boyfriends, husbands, relatives and even physicians is very common in Canada. Unfortunately, the bill was defeated in 2nd reading by a vote of 97 to 178. [December 15, 2010]
No bad
Lee Richardson

There are no quotes for Lee Richardson at this time.

Lee Richardson

Here are the answers for the questionnaire as provided by Lee Richardson on 2006.

Question Response
Do you believe that life begins at conception (fertilization)? no response
If elected, will you strive to introduce and pass laws to protect unborn children from the time of conception (fertilization) onward? no response
If elected, would you support all legislative or policy proposals that would result in a meaningful increase of respect and protection for unborn human life? no response
If elected, will you support measures to introduce and pass a law to protect every unborn child from the time of conception (fertilization) onward? No
Are there any circumstances under which you believe a woman should have access to abortion? (note: Medical treatments to save the life of a mother and which result in the UNINTENDED death of her unborn child, are NOT abortions. Eg. in case of tubal pregnancy or cervical cancer) no response
If elected, will you oppose any legislative or regulatory measures designed to permit the deliberate euthanasia of a human being or designed to permit "doctor-assisted suicide"? no response
If elected, will you oppose any initiative to permit "doctor assisted suicide"? Yes
If elected will you actively work to defeat any legislation which permits the deliberate killing, directly or indirectly, of the terminally illl, the handicapped newborn, the terminally ill, and all vulnerable persons, regardless of age and anticipated quality of life? Yes
If elected, would you support measures giving individual Members of Parliament greater power to introduce legislation? Yes
If elected, would you bring forward pro-life measures to be debated and voted upon by the House of Commons? No
Lee Richardson

There are no videos available for Lee Richardson.

  • Legend for Light Rating System
  • Green Light
    GREEN light means the person supports CLC principles and is rated as SUPPORTABLE
  • Red Light
    RED light means the person is NOT SUPPORTABLE
  • Amber Light
    AMBER light means voters should be cautious about the candidate. CLC is still evaluating this individual, does not have enough data, or their record is mixed. View their quotes & voting history to help you decide.