CLC Blog

Motion 506 - We need to cut this agenda of at its roots, before it grows into a towering weed.

On Sunday, October 6, 2019, Canada will partake in its 30th Life Chain since this pro-life witness was first brought north of the border in 1990 . . . I know some pro-lifers wonder if this is an effective form of activism any longer. Is it still relevant? Is it worth the effort?

Last week I posted a blog in which I pointed out that Andrew Scheer gave a problematic speech in which he used loaded, pro-LGBT propaganda terms lifted straight out of the lexicon of the “gay rights” lobby.

On Tuesday, May 4, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced at the Women Deliver Conference in Vancouver that the Government of Canada would increase their spending on “international sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health,” until reaching a total of $1.4 billion annually in 2023.

Andrew Scheer recently gave a speech on immigration which raised red flags for pro-family Canadians who believe in the traditional definition of marriage and the family.

On May 15th, pro-life and pro-family organizations and delegates gathered at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City to observe the 25th Anniversary of the International Day of Families and to commemorate the 25th Anniversary of the International Year of the Family. Campaign Life Coalition attended the event and delivered a three-minute intervention.

Who desires to cause a negative impact upon our world? I’ll let you in on a not-so-secret secret: UN agencies, the United Nations, and those advocating for the dismantlement of the traditional family.

One of the most frustrating aspects of the ongoing Commission for the Status of Women (CSW) event (held this year from March 11 to March 22) and probably UN events in general, is the lack of clarity in the use of terms. For example, let’s take the term “gender equality”.

There's disturbing evidence that the public consultation process was rigged against the parents who elected Doug Ford in the first place. This includes selective screening of which opinions were allowed to be voiced at telephone town halls, voter suppression, plus a process designed to be easily hi-jacked by the left.

This story is so incredibly fishy. It stinks like a mackerel that was left in the sun for a couple of days. It smells of collusion. And I don’t mean the fake kind of collusion peddled by CNN about Donald Trump allegedly plotting with Russians to fix the presidential election.